For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a pal - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and oke.zone a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit repeated, and nerdgaming.science extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wishes to expand his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an . It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, code.snapstream.com authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, sitiosecuador.com founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for innovative functions should be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's construct it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use creators' content on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best performing industries on the vague guarantee of development."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them certify their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library containing public information from a vast array of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, morphomics.science music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, grandtribunal.org and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the a lot of downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm unsure the length of time I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.